Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13485
Record ID: dbe10f38-a558-4780-ae6d-28705e66b951
Type: | Journal Article |
Title: | Assessing the risks of future psychological abuse: predicting the accuracy of battered women's predictions |
Other Titles: | Journal of family violence |
Authors: | Goodman, Lisa A Dutton, Mary Ann Bell, Margret E Cattaniao, Lauren Bennett |
Keywords: | Risk assessment |
Year: | 2008 |
Publisher: | Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers |
Citation: | 23 (2), February 2008 |
Notes: | Building on a handful of studies demonstrating battered women’s accuracy in assessing their risk of being physically reabused, this study examined how accurately victims assess their risk of future psychological abuse. Participants’ ratings of the likelihood that their partner would engage in controlling/dominance behaviors or efforts to humiliate/degrade them in the coming year and their reports 18 months later of whether this had actually occurred were used to create a four category version of accuracy (true positive, false positive, true negative, false negative). Victims were more likely to be right than wrong in their assessments of risk; PTSD symptoms, the recency of physical violence, and the degree of stalking and psychological abuse in the relationship predicted membership in the four accuracy categories. These findings overlap considerably with those examining victim accuracy in predicting physical abuse and inform ongoing debates about the value of incorporating victims’ insights into risk assessment efforts. |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13485 |
ISSN: | 0885-7482 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.