Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13615
Record ID: 1a468881-91ae-47fe-b030-a9321be955bd
Web resource: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26475517 |
Type: | Journal Article |
Title: | Beliefs and recommendations regarding child custody and visitation in cases involving domestic violence : a comparison of professionals in different roles |
Authors: | Tolman, Richard M Saunders, Daniel G Faller, Kathleen C |
Keywords: | Domestic violence;Intimate partner violence;Children;Service provision;Legal issues |
Year: | 2015 |
Citation: | [ahead-of-print] |
Notes: | Research is lacking on differing perspectives regarding custody cases involving domestic violence (DV). In a survey of judges, legal aid attorneys, private attorneys, DV program workers, and child custody evaluators (n = 1,187), judges, private attorneys, and evaluators were more likely to believe that mothers make false DV allegations and alienate their children. In response to a vignette, evaluators and private attorneys were most likely to recommend joint custody and least likely to recommend sole custody to the survivor. Legal aid attorneys and DV workers were similar on many variables. Gender, DV knowledge, and knowing victims explained many group differences. |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/13615 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.