Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14246
Record ID: 24ce0f0d-e617-4a09-bf94-59f0432c360c
Type: | Journal Article |
Title: | Do self-represented litigants receive a fair trial? The challenge for the Family Court |
Other Titles: | Law Institute journal |
Authors: | Pavone, Rachell |
Keywords: | Family law;Legal issues |
Year: | 2002 |
Publisher: | Law Institute of Victoria |
Citation: | 76 (5), June 2002 |
Notes: | Describes the implications of self-representation in Family Court matters where domestic violence is present. The author utilises the case of T v S, an appeal with regard to residence and contact for a minor, to exemplify the question. The allegations of abuse were hardly considered because the shame, fear and inexperience of the litigant (mother and victim) impeded a fair cross-examination with the father (and perpetrator). A diagnosis of personality disorder was admitted against the mother without considering battered women syndrome. The Appeal Court ordered a retrial. The author points out that the decision might bring consequences for other self-represented litigants, who participate in 35 per cent of Family Court cases in Australia. |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14246 |
ISSN: | 0023-9267 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.