Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14246
Record ID: 24ce0f0d-e617-4a09-bf94-59f0432c360c
Type: Journal Article
Title: Do self-represented litigants receive a fair trial? The challenge for the Family Court
Other Titles: Law Institute journal
Authors: Pavone, Rachell
Keywords: Family law;Legal issues
Year: 2002
Publisher: Law Institute of Victoria
Citation: 76 (5), June 2002
Notes:  Describes the implications of self-representation in Family Court matters where domestic violence is present. The author utilises the case of T v S, an appeal with regard to residence and contact for a minor, to exemplify the question. The allegations of abuse were hardly considered because the shame, fear and inexperience of the litigant (mother and victim) impeded a fair cross-examination with the father (and perpetrator). A diagnosis of personality disorder was admitted against the mother without considering battered women syndrome. The Appeal Court ordered a retrial. The author points out that the decision might bring consequences for other self-represented litigants, who participate in 35 per cent of Family Court cases in Australia.
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14246
ISSN: 0023-9267
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing