Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14473
Record ID: d6b75ebf-f53a-48c8-851e-78822771bc97
Type: | Journal Article |
Title: | Dual arrest and other unintended consequences of mandatory arrest in New York City: a brief report |
Other Titles: | Journal of family violence |
Authors: | Haviland, Mary Rajah, Valli Frye, Victoria |
Keywords: | Policing |
Year: | 2007 |
Publisher: | Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers |
Citation: | 22 (6), August 2007 |
Notes: | In jurisdictions across the United States, the mandated arrest of individuals perpetrating domestic violence crimes termed “mandatory arrest” or “pro-arrest” policies has become a key policy solution to the issue of domestic violence. The purposes of the policies are to standardize the police response to, and increase the number of, arrests stemming from domestic violence incidents by removing or reducing police discretion to arrest. In 1994, the New York state legislature passed the Family Protection and Domestic Violence Intervention Act, which contained provisions enacting a mandatory arrest statute. Using information from 183 callers to a telephone helpline for victims of domestic violence, we describe four unintended consequences of the policy: “unwanted,” “dual,” “retaliatory,” and “no” arrest. Bi- and multivariate analyses are used to identify victim and perpetrator sociodemographic, situational, and legal factors associated with each arrest type. Results are discussed in the context of the effects of mandatory arrest policies and minimizing problems associated with it in the future. |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14473 |
ISSN: | 0885-7482 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.