Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14756
Record ID: 4bd8a9e0-dbd1-4f43-87d0-a37cd7ada34f
Type: | Journal Article |
Title: | Family violence and homelessness: removing the perpetrator from the home |
Other Titles: | Domestic Violence & Incest Resource Centre Newsletter |
Authors: | Southwell, Jenni |
Keywords: | Protection orders;Housing |
Year: | 2002 |
Publisher: | Domestic Violence & Incest Resource Centre |
Citation: | (3), Spring 2002 |
Notes: | In researching the area of family violence which advocates removing the perpetrator from the home, the author finds that there is considerable confusion in Australia over the meaning of the term ‘sole occupancy order’ primarily due to its ‘invisibility’ to potential users of the legislation. Internationally, legal jurisdictions make use of ‘sole occupancy’ or ‘exclusion’ orders under family law, criminal law or dedicated family violence legislation by invoking short- to medium-term court orders to provide a level of protection to aggrieved parties and to address the homelessness they might suffer should the perpetrator not be removed. Southwell looks at the two main avenues available to victims of family violence in Victoria as regards exclusion orders and compares them with overseas legislation and implementation. In discussing the information vacuum which surrounds the use of sole occupancy intervention orders she describes the difficulties for both victims of domestic violence and service providers who approach the legal system as well as the invisibility of these exclusion orders in the area of data collection. |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14756 |
ISSN: | 1324-4264 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.