Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14805
Record ID: ec7e6142-7c29-4001-970f-e6ffbe8d580f
Electronic Resources: https://www.lexisnexis.com.au/aus/services/tools/pdf_toc/ajfl.pdf
Type: Journal Article
Title: Fathers’ allegations of mental health and mothers’ allegations of coercive control: Intersections and outcomes in family law proceedings
Authors: Easteal, Patricia
Drury, James
Keywords: Coercive control
Topic: Policing and legal responses
Categories: Understanding victimisation and perpetration, and their impacts
People with mental health and/or drug and alcohol issues
ANROWS Completed Register of Active Research projects
Year: 2021
Publisher: LexisNexis
Citation: Volume 34, Issue 1
Abstract:  This article examines the possible impact of separated fathers’ coercive control on their former partners’ mental health, and the apparent differential treatment of mothers’ and fathers’ allegations by family law courts. A small select population of judgments for the period 2013–20 published in the Australasian Legal Information Institute were identified. Each matter contained allegations of both maternal mental health issues and allegations of family violence against the father. The analysis of this sample has shown that the psychological impact of coercive control on mothers tends to be minimised. The courts do appear to acknowledge the potential nexus between controlling behaviour and mental health but give primacy to the impact of coercive control on the mother’s parenting capacity rather than on her mental health. This approach can adversely impact mothers because it can result in a child being placed in a violent father’s care.
Notes: 

This research was included in the ANROWS Register of Active Research (RAR). The research has concluded and the output has been added to the ANROWS library. Please visit https://www.anrows.org.au/register-of-active-research/ for more information on the RAR.

PROJECT LEAD
Prof Patricia Easteal
The University of Canberra


EMAIL
patricia.easteal@canberra.edu.au


PROJECT INVESTIGATORS/RESEARCHERS
James Drury

TOPICS
Policing and legal responses
Understanding victimisation and perpetration, and their impacts
Coercive control


POPULATIONS
People with mental health and/or drug and alcohol issues
General population


GEOGRAPHICAL SCOPE
National

BACKGROUND
This study examines the possible impact of separated fathers’ coercive control on their former partners’ mental health, and the apparent differential treatment of mothers’ and fathers’ allegations by family law courts. The authors argue that the psychological impact of coercive control on mothers tends to be minimised. The courts appear to acknowledge the potential nexus between controlling behaviour and mental health but give primacy to the impact of coercive control on the mother’s parenting capacity rather than on her mental health. This approach can adversely impact mothers because it can result in a child being placed in a violent father’s care.

AIM
This project aims to look at the possible impact of separated fathers’ coercive control on their former partners’ mental health, and the apparent differential treatment of mothers’ and fathers’ allegations by family law courts.

METHODS
Thirty family law judgments were found that contained allegations of mental health issues in the mother and allegations of family violence against the father. These spanned the 7-year period from 24 June 2013 to 9 January 2020.

We recorded jurisdiction, location, orders proposed by parties, orders made, accusations of mental health issues, whether the mother had a diagnosed history of mental health, the judicial officer’s assessment of the mother’s parenting capacity, legal representation and the views of the independent children’s lawyer. These data were cross-tabulated where appropriate and analysed thematically to identify common themes in judicial reasoning.

SIGNIFICANCE
The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) needs to be amended to better ensure that the connections between coercive control and maternal mental health are recognised. Our suggestions include expanding s 4AB (1) to include a requirement that the Court consider the impacts of coercive control on mental health, particularly where a decline in mental health has effected psychological harm on the child. Section 4AB (2) could be amended to specifically include systems control as an example of family violence, which might aid in mitigating the Court from unduly dismissing the impact of systems control on a party’s mental health, and thereby their parenting capacity. Further, in acknowledgment of the nexus of allegations against another party’s parenting capacity and its effects on that capacity, we suggest that the alleged party may apply for an injunction restraining further allegations thereby allowing for the alleged party’s parental capacity to be assessed in the absence of further allegations.


PROJECT START DATE
February 2020


EXPECTED COMPLETION DATE
June 2021

URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14805
Appears in Collections:ANROWS Completed Register of Active Research projects

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
ajfl.pdfajfl.pdf51.81 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing