Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14964
Record ID: c90b271e-365c-479f-ab61-b7a610b1933b
Type: Journal Article
Title: Gendered violence and the ethics of social science research
Other Titles: Violence against women
Authors: Mulla, Sameena
Hlavka, Heather
Keywords: Standards;Service provision
Year: 2011
Publisher: Sage Publications
Citation: 17 (12), December 2011
Notes:  The issue of ethical conduct in research settings is important and complex. As tenure-track researchers who study gendered violence, we found Clark and Walker’s discussion provocative, thoughtful, and interesting. They urge researchers to attend both to the structural dynamics of research carried out under the pressures of tenure and promotion while advocating an ethical frame that draws attention to the limited definition of risk or harm that animates typical human subjects research. Victims of violence, they argue, should not be subjected to a standardized understanding of risk. A broader framework is needed, one that brings into conversation virtue ethics with consequentialist and ontological frameworks.

Given the impossible task of responding to the many points discussed by Clark and Walker, we chose to focus on four areas. In all likelihood, these areas of discussion reflect our own interests rather than Clark and Walker’s, but challenged to think seriously about research ethics in victimization studies, we attend to the following points.
[?2011 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. For further information, visit SAGE Publications link.]
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14964
ISSN: 1077-8012
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing