How should the police respond to domestic violence: a therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of mandatory arrest

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15116

Record ID: 16e3a6e9-15cf-4e5b-ab02-98875814d40b

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Saccuzzo, Dennis P	en
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-30T23:17:04Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-06-30T23:17:04Z	-
dc.date.issued	1999	en
dc.identifier.citation	39 (3), 1999	en
dc.identifier.issn	1460315	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15116	-
dc.language	en	en
dc.publisher	School of Law, University of Santa Clara	en
dc.subject	Policing	en
dc.subject	Criminal justice responses	en
dc.title	How should the police respond to domestic violence: a therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of mandatory arrest	en
dc.title.alternative	Santa Clara law review	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.catalogid	2325	en
dc.subject.keyword	International	en
dc.subject.keyword	new_record	en
dc.subject.keyword	Journal article/research paper	en
dc.description.notes	Describes the problem of domestic violence by illustrating how police officers deal with it, provides an in depth explanation and analysis of therapeutic jurisprudence, and discusses the effectiveness of mandatory arrest in the US. Provides five arguments supporting mandatory arrest, then explores their weaknesses. Specific arguments against mandatory arrest are put forward, including the various messages mandatory arrest promotes to the victim, perpetrator and society. Concludes with a proposal for police training and applications to the Prosecution and Judiciary.	en
dc.identifier.source	Santa Clara law review	en
dc.date.entered	2001-03-01	en
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Who's citing