Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15227
Record ID: bdf26e6c-e23d-4ae3-aacd-37741ee5a0e2
DOI: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2008.08.003<Go |
Electronic Resources: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539508000939 ISI>://000260706800004 to |
Type: | Journal Article |
Title: | Incorporation rather than recovery: Living with the legacy of domestic violence |
Other Titles: | Women Stud Int Forum |
Authors: | Lindsay, J Evans, I |
Categories: | Recovery |
Year: | 2008 |
Citation: | No 5 Vol.: 31 |
Notes: | Concepts of recovery dominate academic and popular understandings of the post-relationship experiences of survivors of domestic violence. However, we argue that using a recovery framework may be problematic and ultimately counter-productive whereas the concept of incorporation is better for understanding the experiences of survivors of domestic violence. This argument is based on an in-depth study of 134 survivors of domestic violence at least 12months after leaving the abusive relationship in Melbourne, Australia. 134 women participated in a survey and 48 women took part in additional follow-up interviews. Recovery is unlikely because the effects of domestic violence usually continue to impact on the lives of survivors particularly where ongoing contact with perpetrators is necessary. We discuss the implications of using the concept of incorporation instead of recovery for academics, service providers and ultimately for survivors themselves. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15227 |
ISSN: | 0277-5395 |
Physical description: | Pages 355-362 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.