Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15482
Record ID: 2c1398e8-635e-4e28-9450-a27393baa943
Web resource: https://www.uwa.edu.au/schools/law
Type: Journal Article
Title: Intimidation, consent and the role of holistic judgements in Australian rape law
Authors: Sveinsson, Lara
Crowe, Jonathan
Keywords: Judicial processes;Consent;Legislation;Legislation analysis;Australia;Rape;Law
Year: 2017
Citation: Vol. 42 ; pp. 136-154
Notes:  "This article examines the circumstances in which intimidation will vitiate consent to
sex under Australian rape law. It begins by summarising the legislative provisions in
the various Australian jurisdictions, before surveying recent appellate case law.
Existing cases can usefully be grouped into a number of categories based on the kinds
of intimidation involved. There is, however, almost always some degree of overlap
between the various different forms of intimidation and other factors relevant to
determining consent. The article concludes by examining the reasoning process
utilised by the courts in these kinds of cases. It is argued that judges rely heavily on a
holistic assessment of the facts of each case to determine whether consent is legally
effective. This has important consequences for how statutory definitions of rape are
interpreted and applied."

Available online, see: http://www.law.uwa.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/3033846/6.-Crowe-and-Sveinsson.pdf
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15482
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing