Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15543
Record ID: 499c4e4b-f3dc-45b7-91f8-58edab51454b
Web resource: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79954720382&partnerID=40&md5=a81296b90b30cad933b426814cf2a90b
Type: Journal Article
Title: Jurisdictions of Sexual Assault: Reforming the Texts and Testimony of Rape in Australia
Other Titles: Feminist Legal Studies
Authors: Rush, P. D
Year: 2011
Citation: No 1 Vol.: 19
Notes:  The reform of rape law remains a vexed enterprise. The wager of this article is that the plural traditions and technologies of criminal law can provide the resources for a radical rethinking of rape law. Parts 1 and 2 return to the historical and structural forms of rape law reform in Australia. These forms of reform illustrate a variety of criminal jurisdictions, and a transformation in the way in which rape law reform is conducted now. Against this transformation, Part 3 takes up the technology of classification in rape law in order to generate a radical legal definition of rape-one which responds to the pain and suffering of the survivor of rape, at the same time as it holds the legal institution before the law. This has important implications, it is suggested, not only for domestic legal systems but also the jurisprudence of rape in international criminal law. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Export Date: 23 July 2013Source: Scopus
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15543
Physical description: Pages 47-73
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing