Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15603
Record ID: e6fc37e4-8705-452d-861e-c5722d5b5f62
Electronic Resources: https://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/article/legal-responses-to-non-consensual-smartphone-recordings-in-the-context-of-domestic-and-family-violence
Type: Journal Article
Title: Legal responses to non-consensual smartphone recordings in the context of domestic and family violence
Authors: Douglas, Heather
Burdon, Mark
Keywords: Legal processes;Australia;Domestic violence;Violence against women;Family violence;Evidence
Year: 2018
Publisher: UNSW
Citation: Vol. 41, no. 1 ; pp. 157-184
Volume 41, No. 1
Abstract:  The increasingly ubiquitous use of smartphones is further complicating the legal response to domestic and family violence (‘DFV’). Perpetrators can now use smartphone recording facilities to record private conversations and activities of their (ex-)partners. Such behaviour may be a criminal offence of breach of a domestic and family violence protection order or stalking. On the other hand, those who have experienced DFV can record perpetrators and use
the recordings in legal proceedings. The use of non-consensual smartphone recordings as evidence in DFV related cases is increasing and courts must determine when recordings are admissible. A key factor in making such determinations is whether the recording contravenes state-based criminal laws and listening and surveillance devices law. Drawing on reported experiences of the use of smartphone recordings in the context of DFV we show why further consideration and legal reform is needed if the law is to keep pace with this issue.
Notes: 

Heather Douglas, Australian Research Council Future Fellow (FT140100796).

URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15603
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing