Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15617
Record ID: d9f0b74d-275c-4028-85ab-9518ac14df6f
Type: Journal Article
Title: Lessons from a successful and failed random assignment testing batterer program innovations
Other Titles: Journal of Experimental Criminology
Authors: Gondolf, Edward W
Keywords: Perpetrator programs;Counselling;Mental health
Year: 2010
Publisher: Springer Publishing
Citation: 6 (4), December 2010
Notes:  With increasing pressure to conduct experimental evaluations of domestic violence interventions, it is important to weigh further the most challenging aspect of experimental designs: the implementation of random assignment. This paper reviews two attempted experimental evaluations of counseling programs for domestic violence offenders, and formulates implications for conducting and interpreting program evaluations. The two [US] case studies offer an instructive comparison of a maximally implemented experiment and a failed one at the same setting. In the first study, the random assignment was introduced within the counseling program and with implicit leverage of court sanctions for non-compliance to the assignment. In the second, random assignment was disrupted by unforeseeable events and inter-agency breakdowns in the complex referral system. Interestingly, implementation issues in both studies raised divergent interpretations from researchers and practitioners. They appear to imply a need for more disclosure of implementation problems in experimental evaluations and for more caution about over interpreting the existing experimental evaluations in the field. ? Springer, Part of Springer Science+Business Media. For further information, visit SpringerLink .
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15617
ISSN: 1573-3750
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing