Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15620
Record ID: b0f6cefe-1c6d-49b1-be69-742e17c346d8
Type: | Journal Article |
Title: | Lessons from two randomized experiments in criminal justice settings |
Other Titles: | Crime & Delinquency |
Authors: | Jolin, Annette Feyerherm, William Feder, Lynette |
Keywords: | Criminal justice responses |
Year: | 2000 |
Publisher: | Sage Publications |
Citation: | 46 (3), July 2000 |
Notes: | Discusses the implementation of two domestic violence research studies from the US, highlighting some of the difficulties associated with developing, implementing and running research experiments in the criminal justice setting. The first examined the impact court-mandated counselling has on the likelihood of future violence. The second aimed to determine whether arrest for domestic violence coupled with prosecution and victim empowerment was more effective in reducing violence than arrest alone. A brief description of each of the studies is provided and the major problems encountered are identified. These include gaining and maintaining agency cooperation, problems in sample size due to overestimation of target population, resistance/hostility of various agencies, hostility engendered by the political context, high staff turnover and a lack of researcher control over critical aspects of the experimental process. Some suggestions for preventing and/or overcoming some of these problems are then provided and it is concluded that with careful planning and preparation, experimental research can be implemented successfully, eliciting valuable information for those working in welfare, health or legal professions |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15620 |
ISSN: | 0011-1287 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.