Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16439
Record ID: 6168e394-4f43-423d-a81b-ec4c499a3fb0
Type: Journal Article
Title: Public justification of intimate partner violence: a review of the literature
Other Titles: Trauma, violence & abuse
Authors: Waltermaurer, Eve
Keywords: Community attitudes
Year: 2012
Publisher: Sage Publications
Citation: 13 (3), July 2012
Notes:  Understanding the extent to which the general public justifies intimate partner violence (IPV) is necessarily to explain perpetration, victimization, and response to this behavior. This article provides a literature review of quantitative studies measuring IPV justification among the general population. Key word searching of two databases plus bibliographies, and the web yielded 23 studies that provided comparable measures of IPV justification. Results are summarized for the prevalence of IPV justification identified for each country including differences in justification based on the initiating event (e.g., burning food and infidelity), sociodemographic differences in justification and differences across countries. No study identified a zero prevalence of IPV justification and percentages varied considerably across and within countries. Females tended to report a higher rate of IPV justification than males and younger respondents tended to report a higher rate IPV justification than their older counterparts. Further research is needed to understand IPV justification within and across nations as well as to explore the impact this has on IPV prevalence and policy.

[?2012 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. For further information, visit SAGE Publications link.]
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16439
ISSN: 1524-8380
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing