Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16479
Record ID: 32f07cd8-6664-4f25-9a6e-e7eacee2b97c
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/653101
Electronic Resources: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/653101
Type: Journal Article
Title: Rape and Attrition in the Legal Process: A Comparative Analysis of Five Countries
Other Titles: Crime and Justice
Authors: Bouhours, Brigitte
Daly, Kathleen
Year: 2010
Publisher: The University of Chicago Press
Citation: No 1 Vol.: 39
Notes:  Despite legal reforms, there has been little improvement in police, prosecutor, and court handling of rape and sexual assault. In the past 15 years in Australia, Canada, England and Wales, Scotland, and the United States, victimization surveys show that 14 percent of sexual violence victims report the offense to the police. Of these, 30 percent proceed to prosecution, 20 percent are adjudicated in court, 12.5 percent are convicted of any sexual offense, and 6.5 percent are convicted of the original offense charged. In the past 35 years, average conviction rates have declined from 18 percent to 12.5 percent, although they have not fallen in all countries. Significant country differences are evident in how cases are handled and where in the legal process attrition is most likely. There is some good news: a victim’s “good” character and credibility and stranger relations are less important than they once were in police or court outcomes. However, evidence of nonconsent (witness evidence, physical injuries to the victim, suspect’s use of a weapon) continues to be important.
Electronic Resource Number:
10.1086/653101
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16479
ISSN: 1923234
Physical description: Pages 565-650
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing