The ANROWS Digital Library provides links to a broad range of evidence in the violence against women sector including research papers, reports and resources.

The library is committed to providing access to high-quality and accessible (open access) evidence to ensure that researchers, policymakers, and practitioners have access to research and resources that are relevant to their work in the prevention of violence against women.

Please note that some content such as journal articles and books are restricted from public access due to copyright restrictions. Please refer to the information on the record to locate these resources externally.

If you have any questions or need help accessing resources, please contact publications@anrows.org.au.


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/19059
Record ID: 40c1efc5-78d6-43c9-b4d9-599eae2cd3b4
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWestmarland, Nicoleen
dc.contributor.authorHester, Marianneen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:43:41Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:43:41Z-
dc.date.issued2005en
dc.identifier.citationHome Office Research Study 290en
dc.identifier.isbn9781844735563en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/19059-
dc.formatxvi, 134 p., 25 cm.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherHome Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorateen
dc.relation.isversionof290en
dc.subjectScreeningen
dc.subjectInteragency worken
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.subjectTrainingen
dc.subjectPeer educationen
dc.subjectAdvocacyen
dc.subjectPreventionen
dc.titleTackling domestic violence : effective interventions and approachesHome Office research studyen
dc.typeReporten
dc.identifier.catalogid3577en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dro.dur.ac.uk/2556/1/2556.pdfen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordReporten
dc.subject.keywordElectronic publicationen
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.description.notesThis reports on the UK Home Office projects through the Crime Reduction Programme (CRP) aimed at identifying ‘what worked’ to support victims and tackle domestic violence. It found that, with primary prevention to raise awareness among young people: it was valued when it was student-centred, interactive with visual input such as drama; and the need for training for teachers and multi-agency support; and cross curricular approaches reinforced the programme impacts.<br/ ><br/ >With regard to supporting women to disclose: routine enquiry was effective in health care settings, and may be applied to a wider range of practitioners; training was important and so were multi-agency relationships and referral systems.<br/ ><br/ >Supporting women to report to police was effective: when they were supported to engage with the criminal justice system through legal advocacy; when project workers were based in the police community safety unit or where the police were based in the project (one-stop-shop); when close links between the projects and the police led to an increase in arrest rates and referrals; when legal support specifically focusing on Black and other minority ethnic women, including workers with minority language skills, increased their engagement with the criminal justice system; with the use of photographic evidence which appeared to improve arrest rates, increase the number of witness statements and reduce the number of victims withdrawing their statements. However, the ‘patchiness’ of police responses still needs to be addressed, and more research is needed as the photographic evidence were based on small numbers and did not use a ‘matched cases’ design.<br/ ><br/ >Supporting women through the courts worked well: when close links with good family law solicitors, legal workers and police officers in the project enhanced the use of civil remedies; when women found it useful to be accompanied at court and when services were a ‘one-stop-shop’ model. It was found that: women felt let down when sentences appeared lenient such as in the case of fines; training for magistrates led to a higher proportion of custodial sentences; and systems need to monitor cases through the criminal and civil justice systems. With reducing repeat victimisation: target hardening and advocacy approaches; the most effective approach was the tailoring of advocacy and support to the needs of the victim. Both a panic alarm and home security had the most impact; along with regular risk assessments.en
dc.date.entered2005-11-03en
dc.publisher.placeLondonen
dc.description.physicaldescriptionxvi, 134 p., 25 cm.en
Appears in Collections:Reports

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
2556.pdf2556.pdf575.58 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing