Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/19812
Record ID: 66eb0045-ec93-430e-bbb4-72f89efbddea
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Trevoren
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:48:56Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:48:56Z-
dc.date.issued2000en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/19812-
dc.formativ, 22 p.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherDepartment of Justice Canadaen
dc.subjectLegal issuesen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.titleCharging and prosecution policies in cases of spousal assault : a synthesis of research, academic, and judicial responsesen
dc.typeReporten
dc.identifier.catalogid4291en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/rr01_5/rr01_5.pdfen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordReporten
dc.subject.keywordElectronic publicationen
dc.subject.keywordLanguageen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordFrenchen
dc.description.notesFINAL REPORT; November 2000<br/ >Attempts to draw together recent social science research, academic commentary and Canadian jurisprudence examining the impact and effectiveness of ‘no drop’ policies in reducing the incidence and recidivism rates of spousal abuse. The report provides an overview of six main areas – the effectiveness of ‘no drop’ policies in achieving deterrence, victims, prosecutors and police perspectives on the policy, alternatives and suggestions for reform and judicial commentary on the developments. Whilst the case law on mandatory charging was found to be relatively sparse, a wide range of studies relating to the effectiveness of and responses to the policy have been conducted, producing mixed results. It is suggested that further research and evaluation of existing approaches are needed if the impact of ‘no drop’ policies is to be fully understood.en
dc.date.entered2002-10-11en
dc.description.contentsIntroduction<br/ >Ch. 1: Effectiveness of the policies in achieving deterrence<br/ >Ch. 2: Victim perspectives on the policy<br/ >Ch. 3: Police perspectives on the policy<br/ >Ch. 4: Prosecutor perspectives on the policy<br/ >Ch. 5: Academic and public suggestions for reform<br/ >Ch. 6: Judicial commentary on the policy<br/ >Referencesen
dc.publisher.placeOttawa, Canadaen
dc.description.physicaldescriptioniv, 22 p.en
Appears in Collections:Reports

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
rr01_5.pdfrr01_5.pdf380.94 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing