Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/19812
Record ID: 66eb0045-ec93-430e-bbb4-72f89efbddea
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Brown, Trevor | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:48:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:48:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2000 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/19812 | - |
dc.format | iv, 22 p. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Department of Justice Canada | en |
dc.subject | Legal issues | en |
dc.subject | Criminal justice responses | en |
dc.title | Charging and prosecution policies in cases of spousal assault : a synthesis of research, academic, and judicial responses | en |
dc.type | Report | en |
dc.identifier.catalogid | 4291 | en |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/rr01_5/rr01_5.pdf | en |
dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Report | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Electronic publication | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Language | en |
dc.subject.keyword | International | en |
dc.subject.keyword | French | en |
dc.description.notes | FINAL REPORT; November 2000<br/ >Attempts to draw together recent social science research, academic commentary and Canadian jurisprudence examining the impact and effectiveness of ‘no drop’ policies in reducing the incidence and recidivism rates of spousal abuse. The report provides an overview of six main areas – the effectiveness of ‘no drop’ policies in achieving deterrence, victims, prosecutors and police perspectives on the policy, alternatives and suggestions for reform and judicial commentary on the developments. Whilst the case law on mandatory charging was found to be relatively sparse, a wide range of studies relating to the effectiveness of and responses to the policy have been conducted, producing mixed results. It is suggested that further research and evaluation of existing approaches are needed if the impact of ‘no drop’ policies is to be fully understood. | en |
dc.date.entered | 2002-10-11 | en |
dc.description.contents | Introduction<br/ >Ch. 1: Effectiveness of the policies in achieving deterrence<br/ >Ch. 2: Victim perspectives on the policy<br/ >Ch. 3: Police perspectives on the policy<br/ >Ch. 4: Prosecutor perspectives on the policy<br/ >Ch. 5: Academic and public suggestions for reform<br/ >Ch. 6: Judicial commentary on the policy<br/ >References | en |
dc.publisher.place | Ottawa, Canada | en |
dc.description.physicaldescription | iv, 22 p. | en |
Appears in Collections: | Reports |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
rr01_5.pdf | rr01_5.pdf | 380.94 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.