Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/20402
Record ID: caa5858a-1a3c-484f-84d4-c178809d8273
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNeilson, Linda Cen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:53:09Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:53:09Z-
dc.date.issued2018en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/20402-
dc.description.abstract"In this article I explore how Canadian courts are responding to parental alienation claims. The goal is to assess empirically whether or not the academic and professional concerns of critics have an empirical basis." (page 2-3)en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherMuriel McQueen Fergusson Centre for Family Violence Researchen
dc.subjectSeparation and/or divorceen
dc.subjectSafetyen
dc.subjectCustody and accessen
dc.subjectParentingen
dc.subjectLegal issuesen
dc.subjectDomestic violenceen
dc.subjectFamily violenceen
dc.subjectChildrenen
dc.titleParental alienation empirical analysis : child best interests or parental rights?en
dc.typeReporten
dc.identifier.catalogid15257en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordParental alientationen
dc.subject.keywordChildren's rightsen
dc.date.entered2018-08-30en
dc.publisher.placeFredericton, NBen
Appears in Collections:Reports

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing