Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/20592
Record ID: 283004c3-047c-48be-b076-3633cf1d240f
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Boraen
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jeongsuken
dc.contributor.authorFarber, Naomi B.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:54:23Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:54:23Z-
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.citationVolume 107en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/20592-
dc.description.abstractEarly violent socialization in family and community contexts has consistently been found to affect individuals' attitudes toward interpersonal violence in adulthood. The specific sources and processes underlying children’s acquisition of attitudes toward violence, however, are poorly specified and unelaborated. The current study examined how three types of early violent socialization differently influenced college students’ (N = 3841) acceptance of interpersonal violence and how these influences differed according to gender. Findings from multiple linear regression analyses indicated that advised violence, witnessed violence, and victimized violence each contributed to college students’ acceptance of violence as a valid problem-solving strategy. However, each form of violence differently affected students’ acceptance of violence. Receiving verbal advice to be violent from family and community members had stronger associations with students’ acceptance of interpersonal violence than did witnessing or experiencing violence during childhood. These relationships were not significantly different between male and female students. Whereas existing studies on violent socialization have largely focused on the effects of witnessing and experiencing violence during childhood, our findings also highlight the significant impact of that receiving pro-violence messages from family and community members has on young college students’ acceptance of interpersonal violence. This connection suggests that educational programs targeting parents and community elders should focus on encouraging anti-violence attitudes and coaching children in nonviolent conflict-resolution skills. Our results might help inform college violence prevention practitioners in developing programs for college students to help change their pro-violence attitudes.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofChildren and Youth Services Reviewen
dc.titleWhere do they learn violence? The roles of three forms of violent socialization in childhooden
dc.typeReporten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104494en
dc.identifier.catalogid15830en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2019 September 19en
dc.identifier.sourceChildren and Youth Services Reviewen
dc.date.entered2020-01-14en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2019 September 19en
Appears in Collections:Reports

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing