Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/20903
Record ID: 5a20be2e-364b-454c-8285-7d19709ca3ce
Type: | Conference Paper |
Title: | Australian judicial approaches to international human rights conventions and "family law" |
Other Titles: | Family law conference : the changing legal definitions of family, Cape Tow[cut] |
Authors: | Nicholson, Alastair |
Keywords: | Legal issues;Family law;Human rights |
Year: | 2002 |
Publisher: | Family Court of Australia |
Notes: | Noting the absence of any constitutionally entrenched domestic Bill of Rights in Australia, and the requirement that human rights instruments be incorporated into domestic law before they have any legal force, this article argues that, given these deficiencies, there is a burden placed on the common law rules and judicial interpretation of statute to ‘fill the gap’, particularly in the area of family law. A series of cases in which Australia’s human rights obligations under international instruments have converged with family law doctrines and rules, such as applications for relocation and legal representation of domestic violence victims in family law proceedings, are reviewed and it is suggested that the current judicial position, whilst legally justifiable, leaves the instruments of human rights law without substantial utility. |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/20903 |
Physical description: | 32 p. |
Appears in Collections: | Conference Papers |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.