Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22721
Record ID: e529f638-7d7b-4df7-8f90-52d7f08e41e4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02937-y
Web resource: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-024-02937-y?
Type: Journal Article
Title: Prevalence of Sexual Strangulation/Choking Among Australian 18–35 Year-Olds
Authors: Sharman, Leah
Fitzgerald, Robin
Douglas, Heather
Keywords: Sexual Violence;Gender-Based Violence;Young Adults;Sexual Health and Safety;Consent;Sexual Coercion;Strangulation;Co-design
Topic: Children and young people
Drivers and/or risk factors of violence
Coercive control
Impacts of violence
Sexual violence
Population: Children and young people
LGBTQ communities
Year: 3-Jul-2024
Publisher: Springer Link
Abstract:  In Australia, strangulation has been explicitly criminalised in all states and territories. However, it continues to be a “normalised” sexual practice despite its potentially fatal consequences and associated short and long-term sequelae. This research aimed to establish the prevalence of strangulation during sex and examine predictors of positive perceptions toward sexual strangulation in Australia. Confidential, cross-sectional online surveys were conducted with 4702 Australians aged 18–35 years. Participants were 47% cis-men, 48% cis-women, and 4% trans or gender diverse. A total of 57% reported ever being sexually strangled (61% women, 43% men, 79% trans or gender diverse) and 51% reported ever strangling a partner (40% women, 59% men, 74% trans or gender diverse). Differences were found across genders on all variables of sexual strangulation, including frequency of engagement, level of pressure on the neck, consequences, wanting and enjoyment, and how consent was given/received. However, when split by gender, sexual orientation of men and women revealed further differences in behaviours, consequences, and wanting, particularly among straight and bisexual women. After accounting for exposure to strangulation in pornography and previous experience of sexual strangulation, positive perceptions of being strangled (R2 = .51) and strangling a partner (R2 = .53) were predicted by ratings that it could be done safely and social normative factors. These findings suggest strangulation is common during sex among young Australians. Non-stigmatising education strategies are needed to engage with young people so they have a better understanding of the risks involved and how to negotiate consent and safety regarding sexual strangulation.
Notes:  This research was included in the ANROWS Register of Active Research (RAR). The research has concluded and the output has been added to the ANROWS library. Please visit https://www.anrows.org.au/register-of-active-research/ for more information on the RAR.

Project: The non-fatal strangulation offence as a response to domestic violence

Abstract/project description: Many women escaping domestic violence report non-fatal strangulation from their past partner.

Aims: This project aims to review the application and experience of the non-fatal strangulation offence as a response to domestic violence. It will generate new knowledge about the operation of the non-fatal strangulation offence in practice.

Methods: This project uses a mixed methods design.

Significance: Expected outcomes of the project include the development of law reform and policy recommendations to improve the operation of the offence, enhance service responses and develop professional education. This research will provide significant social and economic benefits through better understanding of the legal response to domestic violence.
Description: Open access
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22721
Appears in Collections:ANROWS Completed Register of Active Research projects
Journal Articles
New research: July 2024

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
s10508-024-02937-y.pdf
  Restricted Access
816.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing