Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/23021
Record ID: 616290ae-2eb8-48c0-8f89-9f84f537aeb3
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Eckhardt, Christopher I. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Murphy, Christopher M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Whitaker, Daniel J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sprunger, Joel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dykstra, Rita | - |
dc.contributor.author | Woodard, Kim | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-13T08:33:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-13T08:33:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 4, Issue 2, 196–231 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/23021 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This systematic review provides an in-depth analysis of intervention programs targeting both perpetrators and victim-survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV). The study examines empirical research published since 1990, focusing on randomized and quasi-experimental studies that compare active intervention programs with relevant control conditions. Findings reveal that traditional batterer intervention programs (BIPs) show mixed results in reducing IPV recidivism, with methodological challenges limiting definitive conclusions. Emerging models incorporating alternative content demonstrate more promising results. For IPV victim-survivors, interventions such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) effectively improve emotional functioning, while community-based advocacy programs reduce revictimization rates. However, brief safety interventions produce inconsistent outcomes in long-term IPV prevention. The review highlights the ongoing need for rigorous evaluations of intervention programs and the development of more effective strategies for both perpetrators and victim-survivors. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Partner Abuse | en_US |
dc.subject | International Perspectives | en_US |
dc.subject | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | People who use Domestic, Family, or Sexual Violence | en_US |
dc.subject | Victims and Survivors | en_US |
dc.subject | Therapeutic Interventions | en_US |
dc.subject | Perpetrator Interventions | en_US |
dc.subject | Behaviour Change Programs | en_US |
dc.subject | Pathways into and out of Perpetration | en_US |
dc.subject | Victim and Survivor Support Services | en_US |
dc.subject | Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation | en_US |
dc.title | The effectiveness of intervention programs for perpetrators and victims of intimate partner violence | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.4.2.196 | en_US |
dc.identifier.url | https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrpa/4/2/196 | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | domestic violence perpetrator programs | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Batterer intervention programs (BIPs) | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Men's Behaviour Change Programs (MBCPs) | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Victim-survivor therapeutic approaches | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for IPV survivors | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Revictimization prevention strategies | en_US |
dc.description.notes | For access enquiries, contact <a href="mailto:publications@anrows.org.au">publications@anrows.org.au</a>. | en_US |
dc.subject.anratopic | Perpetrator interventions | en_US |
dc.subject.anrapopulation | People who use domestic, family and sexual violence | en_US |
dc.identifier.bibtype | Journal article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles Men’s Behaviour Change Programs (MBCPs) |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.