Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15207
Record ID: 111da2d9-1a5a-446a-adc6-413340432a2b
Type: | Journal Article |
Title: | In person versus computer screening for intimate partner violence among pregnant patients |
Other Titles: | Patient education and counseling |
Authors: | Holland, Cynthia L Chang, Judy C Dado, Diane Schussler, Sara Hawker, Lynn Burke, Jessica G Cluss, Patricia A |
Keywords: | Pregnancy;Screening |
Year: | 2012 |
Publisher: | Elsevier Science |
Citation: | 88 (3), September 2012 |
Notes: | This journal article contains the findings of a study which compared computerised screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) with face-to-face interviews with obstetric care providers. The participants’ feedback led to the conclusion that both forms of screening were valuable and should be used in tandem. Computerised screening allows for higher rates disclosure of IPV due to its confidential nature and the absence of fear of judgement. Face-to-face screening provides greater flexibility and nuance in interview scenarios. |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15207 |
ISSN: | 0738-3991 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.