Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15207
Record ID: 111da2d9-1a5a-446a-adc6-413340432a2b
Type: Journal Article
Title: In person versus computer screening for intimate partner violence among pregnant patients
Other Titles: Patient education and counseling
Authors: Holland, Cynthia L
Chang, Judy C
Dado, Diane
Schussler, Sara
Hawker, Lynn
Burke, Jessica G
Cluss, Patricia A
Keywords: Pregnancy;Screening
Year: 2012
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Citation: 88 (3), September 2012
Notes:  This journal article contains the findings of a study which compared computerised screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) with face-to-face interviews with obstetric care providers. The participants’ feedback led to the conclusion that both forms of screening were valuable and should be used in tandem. Computerised screening allows for higher rates disclosure of IPV due to its confidential nature and the absence of fear of judgement. Face-to-face screening provides greater flexibility and nuance in interview scenarios.
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15207
ISSN: 0738-3991
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing