Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15714
Record ID: 5bf6e65c-4fb0-4ecb-90b7-06e6d92617f3
Web resource: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84861742497&partnerID=40&md5=db23597bc82135ba7c1ec2517e8ab5d8
Type: Journal Article
Title: Male perpetrators, the gender symmetry debate, and the rejection-abuse cycle : implications for treatment
Other Titles: American Journal of Men's Health
Authors: Brown, J
Year: 2012
Citation: No 4 Vol.: 6
Notes:  This review article examined the gender symmetry debate in light of recent research relating to the feminist and family research perspectives on intimate partner violence, providing a context for rethinking perpetrator programs. The concept of coercive control is considered as an explanatory factor in an attempt to integrate the feminist and family research perspectives. The limited effectiveness of perpetrator programs is examined. Research highlighting potential factors that could improve the effectiveness of perpetrator programs is introduced, followed by a discussion of the rejection-abuse cycle, one attempt to incorporate current research into a more inclusive program. The rejection-abuse cycle identifies a pattern of perpetrator behavior, which links rejection, threat to self, defense against threat, and abuse. Finally, suggestions for changing perpetrator programs are elaborated, incorporating past research, which would make them appropriate for both male and female perpetrators. These implications are contextualized within a meta-theory to provide greater clarity for the development of future perpetrator programs. © The Author(s) 2012.
Export Date: 23 July 2013Source: Scopus
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15714
Physical description: Pages 331-343
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing