Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/18705
Record ID: 644764b4-4aee-40bc-8014-db3b4bfb0897
Electronic Resources: | https://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/article/family-violence-cross-examination-and-self-represented-parties-in-the-courtroom-the-differences-gaps-and-deficiencies |
Type: | Report |
Title: | Family Violence, Cross-Examination and Self-Represented Parties in the Courtroom: The Differences, Gaps and Deficiencies |
Authors: | Kaye, Miranda Booth, Tracey Wangmann, Jane |
Year: | 2019 |
Publisher: | UNSW Sydney |
Citation: | Volume 42 |
Abstract: | Since the early 2000s, the ability of a self-represented litigant alleged to have used domestic and family violence including sexual violence to personally cross-examine the alleged victim of that violence has been steadily restricted or prohibited across the Australian jurisdictions. These statutory limitations recognise the traumatic and negative impact such personal cross-examination can have on the |
URI: | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/18705 |
Appears in Collections: | Reports |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Issue-423-Booth-Kaye-and-Wangmann-14.pdf | Issue-423-Booth-Kaye-and-Wangmann-14.pdf | 1.78 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.