Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22823
Record ID: f8c26c76-fa6e-4b6f-bc9e-b923dfc1a611
Web resource: https://doi.org/10.52922/crg77536
Type: Report
Title: Technology-facilitated coercive control: Mapping women’s diverse pathways to safety and justice
Authors: Flynn, Asher
Wheildon, Lisa
Powell, Anastasia
Bentley, Karen
Keywords: Victim Survivor Voices;Domestic and Family Violence (DFV);Digital and Technology-Facilitated Abuse;Coercive Control;Help-Seeking Barriers;Impacts of Violence;Digital and Online Spaces;Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Services;Police, Law, Courts and/or Corrections
Topic: Coercive control
Impacts of violence
Technology-facilitated abuse
Year: Oct-2024
Publisher: Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC)
Abstract:  Perpetrators of domestic and family violence are increasingly using advancements in communication and surveillance technologies to extend their abuse tactics. Concern is growing particularly about how technologies enable and amplify the coercive controlling behaviours of abusive partners and how prepared frontline workers and support services are to assist people experiencing this form of abuse to achieve safety and justice. This study draws on in-depth interviews with victim‑survivors of technology-facilitated coercive control and with frontline and other support service workers who support victim‑survivors, and on workshops with domestic and family violence sector stakeholders, to examine pathways to safety and justice for victim‑survivors. The analysis identifies gaps, limitations and opportunities for improvement in responses to victim‑survivors of this rapidly developing form of domestic and family violence. It presents recommendations directly relevant to policy and practice.

Most victim‑survivors and workers interviewed reported significant gaps and areas for improvement in justice and support services. One considerable gap is a lack of understanding of technology-facilitated coercive control among frontline workers, including police, and in the community more broadly. This means that victim‑survivors do not always recognise that what is happening to them is a form of domestic and family violence. When victim‑survivors do realise that what is occurring is dangerous, police frequently view their reports as isolated incidents, rather than as patterns of behaviour, and diminish or dismiss them, overlooking the risks to women and children. Another significant gap in domestic and family violence services is a lack of funding for specialist suppliers to conduct technology safety scans, with some services relying on local telecommunications stores or students to check devices.

The findings indicate an urgent need for funding for domestic and family violence services, to enable them to provide women and children at risk with technology safety scans and wraparound support. There is an equally urgent need to address the lack of understanding of technology-facilitated coercive control, and the risks associated with patterns of abusive and controlling behaviours generally, particularly within the criminal justice system.
Notes:  Open access
Contents:  Key barriers identified in pathways to justice included:
  • lack of understanding of TFCC, including minimisation of harms and risks, especially among police;
  • inconsistent and poor police responses, including victim-blaming;
  • a focus on individual incidents and other evidentiary issues (eg not being able to provide electronic evidence in court); and
  • retraumatisation and secondary victimisation through the criminal justice system.
Key barriers and challenges identified in pathways to support included:
  • lack of understanding of TFCC;
  • complex needs of victim-survivors;
  • limited capacity of services to provide support (especially pre-crisis and medium to longer term post-crisis);
  • securing women’s safety and providing autonomy;
  • lack of access within services to technological capability; and
  • structural and access barriers.
Key ways to improve pathways to support identified in the research included:
  • increase awareness and understanding of TFCC among frontline workers;
  • improve consistency and quality of police and justice system responses;
  • increase collaboration and integration across response systems;
  • improve training and processes in TFCC identification, risk assessment and responses/referrals for frontline responders;
  • improve specialist advanced TFCC education and training opportunities and resources for DFV workers, including having more tech support workers;
  • increase funding for services for training and specialist technology safety support;
  • increase accessibility and availability of early intervention, longer-term recovery and continuity of care; and
  • integrate interventions that enhance victim-survivors’ safety, confidence and autonomy in technology use after experiencing TFCC.
Recommendations:
  1. Raise awareness and understanding of coercive control (including TFCC) across the general community.
  2. Improve education and primary prevention in school settings focused on technology and safety, including inappropriate online behaviours and challenging gendered stereotypes.
  3. Increase funding for services to respond to the growth in TFCC.
  4. Improve the quality and consistency of police and justice system responses to victim-survivors of TFCC, including through independent review and monitoring.
  5. Improve frontline responder training on how to identify and respond to TFCC and support those experiencing TFCC.
  6. Improve availability of early intervention support for victim-survivors of TFCC.
  7. Improve advanced TFCC training and resources for all DFV workers supporting victim-survivors, including improved access to specialist technology safety engineers.
  8. Increase collaboration, integration and supported transition between services across the system response.
  9. Integrate interventions that provide opportunities to enhance victim-survivor safety, confidence and autonomy in their own technology use in the aftermath of TFCC.
  10. Increase availability of post-crisis recovery and support, including for ongoing tech safety.
Ref Id: CRG 20/21–22
URI: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/22823
Appears in Collections:New Australian Research: October 2024
Reports

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat  
crg_technology-facilitated_coercive_control_v7.pdf1.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing